Description
In the sixth chapter of Believing Is Seeing, Michael Guillen draws a two-by-two grid that sorts every belief a person can hold, and in its lower-right square he files two tenants together: the quantum vacuum and the God of the Bible. His ruling on the pair is brisk. “These cannot be seen, proven, or imagined. But they haven’t been disproven, and both are consistent with the best available evidence.” The whole book argues for the legitimacy of that one square. The barrio childhood, the Cornell lab, the years anchoring science segments for ABC — all of it exists to bring a reader round to the idea that the quantum vacuum and the resurrection belong in the same drawer.
Guillen took a triple doctorate at Cornell, taught physics at Harvard, and won three Emmys reporting science for television before he wrote any of this. Raised Pentecostal, he bolted into atheism somewhere around UCLA and came back to Christianity in middle age. The book threads that return through an argument with a clean shape. Science rests on beliefs it cannot prove — that the universe is explicable, that simpler accounts beat complicated ones, that induction will keep holding — so the sceptic who sneers at faith is running on it himself, unawares. The choice was never reason against faith. It is one faith against another, and all that is left is to ask which kind you have.
That first move is right, and he teaches it with real flair. He is good on Gödel, good on Einstein’s flat admission that no theory can ever be proven true, only falsified. The chapters on the missing-mass problem are the warmest writing here: a young astronomer watching galaxies spin too fast for their visible weight, and the field reaching for dark matter, then dark energy, until ninety-five per cent of the cosmos is conceded to be invisible. His point lands. The positivist who insists on seeing before believing has quietly turned his back on almost everything there is. “Truth is bigger than proof,” Guillen likes to say, and within physics he has earned the line.
The trouble starts when the same word is asked to do two unrelated jobs. The faith a working scientist places in induction and the faith a believer places in a man rising from a tomb are both, in the trivial sense, unprovable. So is my faith that the floor will hold when I stand up. Calling all three “faith” does not make them one species. The scientist’s axioms are not articles he clings to in defiance of evidence; they are bets that have been paid out at every settling, billions of times, which is precisely why he keeps placing them.
Guillen’s own definition ought to register the difference. Enlightened faith, he writes, believes “in hypotheses that are consistent with the best available evidence, even if that evidence is sketchy and ambiguous.” Run that test honestly across his lower-right square and it pulls the two tenants apart rather than binding them. Induction is consistent with the evidence in the strong sense that the evidence keeps confirming it. The resurrection clears only the far softer bar he smuggles in beside it — that it “hasn’t been disproven.” A belief the world keeps verifying and a belief the world merely declines to kill are not equals, and the grid’s chief work is to hide that gap behind a shared tick of approval.
He might answer that neither is provable, so both stand on the same ground. But “not disproven” is the feeblest credential in the whole of reasoning; it would wave the Tooth Fairy through too, which is why she has to be quarantined one cell up, and the only bolt on that door is Guillen’s say-so that she is a tale for children. The quantum vacuum keeps company with the resurrection on paper alone. In the lab it cashes out — the Casimir force, an attraction between two plates with nothing between them, was predicted from the vacuum and then measured. The God he sketches across these pages, virgin birth and Trinity and an empty grave, issues no forecast a measurement could disappoint. Its fit with the evidence is read backward, after the conclusion is already in hand.
And here the book turns on itself. The findings Guillen wields most powerfully — a universe almost entirely invisible, a standard cosmological model he calls a field in crisis, a method too loose to even define — are arguments for humility everywhere, his own verdict included. He pours uncertainty over the atheist’s confidence and somehow not a drop lands on his. The acid strong enough to dissolve “seeing is believing” should also eat at “the resurrection is consistent with the evidence.” He never lets it.
None of which is the tired complaint that the memoir sings and the reasoning stumbles. The reasoning has genuine merit; the stories — snow at Cornell, the terrifying Hans Bethe, the boy dreaming in a white coat — are merely the lighter pleasures. The fault is narrower and harder to forgive: a single word carrying two weights that never balance. An honest version of this book leaves that lower-right square with one tenant in it and a question mark. Guillen, who knows better than most that truth is bigger than proof, never seems to notice that it is also bigger than his certainty.
If you’d like to read the full book in EPUB or MOBI format, feel free to send me an email—I’d be happy to share a free copy with you. Please reach me at: thenovaleaf@gmail.com
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.